Dermatologists' Perspectives on Biosimilars.

BACKGROUND: Biosimilars are biologic agents the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has deemed to have no clinical difference from their reference biologics. In dermatology,  biosimilars are approved for the treatment of psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. Although dermatologists are high prescribers of biologics, they are more reluctant to prescribe biosimilars than other specialists. This survey-based study sought to characterize dermatologists’ current perspectives on biosimilars.  Methods: A 27-question survey was distributed via email to dermatologists between September and October of 2022.  Results: Twenty percent of respondents would not prescribe a biosimilar for an FDA-approved indication. When asked about the greatest barriers to biosimilar adoption, 61% had concerns about biosimilar safety and efficacy, 24% reported uncertainty about state laws for interchangeability and substitutions, and 20% had concerns about biosimilar safety without concerns about efficacy. Thirty-five percent of respondents felt moderately or extremely knowledgeable about biosimilar interchangeability.  Conclusion: Biosimilars are safe and effective for treating approved dermatological conditions and may lower patient costs compared to their reference products. Patients are not always offered biosimilar therapy as an option, which may be due to unfamiliarity among dermatologists.  This survey suggests a need for more research and educational initiatives, such as modules and workshops that focus on biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability guidelines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):doi:10.36849/JDD.7755.

An Update on Current Clinical Management and Emerging Treatments in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a severe, debilitating, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent painful nodules, abscesses and draining sinus tracts in intertriginous areas. While this condition appears to stem from follicular unit dysfunction, its cause is multifactorial and the exact pathogenesis has yet to be fully elucidated. These factors make treatment selection challenging and contribute to variable therapeutic response among affected patients. Typical regimens consist of a combination of medical and surgical modalities, tailored to individual responses. However, HS is often refractory to traditional treatments, prompting the need for newer and more effective therapies. Herein, we review current and emerging HS therapies.

Successful treatment of PASS syndrome with IVIG and anti-IL-1 treatment: A case report.

PASS syndrome is a rare autoinflammatory disease characterized by acne vulgaris, hidradenitis suppurativa, pyoderma gangrenosum, and ankylosing spondylitis. Unlike other autoinflammatory disorders such as PAPA and PASH syndrome, there is no documented gene mutation link. Although there are no established treatment guidelines due to the rarity of these diseases, systemic corticosteroids, biologics, and immunosuppressive drugs are used currently. In our report, we presented a case of PASS syndrome who was unresponsive to adalimumab and in whom we observed improvement in both skin and joint manifestations with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and anti-IL-1 treatment.

Therapeutic Potential of IL-1 Antagonism in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

The immunopathogenesis of HS is partially understood and exhibits features of an autoinflammatory disease; it is associated with the potential involvement of B cells and the contribution of Th1 or Th17 cell subsets. Recently, the pathogenic role of both innate immunity and IL-1 family cytokines in HS has been deeply investigated. Several agents targeting the IL-1 family pathway at different levels are currently available and under investigation for the treatment of HS. HS is still characterized by unmet clinical needs and represents an expanding field in the current scientific research. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the pathological dysregulation of IL-1 family members in HS and to provide an update on therapeutic strategies targeting IL-1 family cytokine signaling. Further clinical and preclinical data may likely lead to the enrichment of the therapeutic armamentarium of HS with IL-1 family cytokine antagonists.

Brepocitinib, Zimlovisertib, and Ropsacitinib in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Kinase Inhibitors for Hidradenitis SuppurativaThree kinase inhibitor immunomodulators (daily oral brepocitinib, zimlovisertib, and ropsacitinib) were evaluated in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 194 patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. At 16 weeks, only brepocitinib, a JAK1/TYK2 inhibitor, achieved a higher clinical response than placebo (52% vs. 33%). The other two agents were no better than placebo.

Liraglutide for the treatment of obesity among patients with hidradenitis suppurativaLiraglutida en el tratamiento de la obesidad en pacientes con hidradenitis supurativa / Liraglutide for the treatment of obesity among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa Liraglutida en el tratamiento de la obesidad en pacientes con hidradenitis supurativa

Background and aims: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with obesity. Weight loss is frequently reflected in an amelioration in the severity of the lesions. Case reports have suggested that liraglutide might improve not only weight but also skin. We aimed to study the effects of liraglutide 3mg in patients with obesity and HS on metabolic and dermatological parameters. Methods: 14 patients started treatment with liraglutide for 3 months. Severity of the lesions was evaluated using the Hurley Staging System and quality of life with the DLQI (Dermatology Quality Index). Results: There was a significant reduction in BMI (39.3±6.2 vs 35.6±5.8; p=0.002), waist circumference (121.3±19.2 vs 110.6±18.1cm; p=0.01), CRP (4.5±2.2 vs 3±2.1mg/L; p=0.04), homocysteine (16.2±2.9 vs 13.3±3μmol/L; p=0.005) and plasma cortisol (15.9±4.8 vs 12.6±4.5μg/dL; p=0.007). Hurley (2.6±0.5 vs 1.1±0.3; p=0.002) and DLQI (12.3±2.8 vs 9.7±6.9; p=0.04) improved significantly. In multiple regression analysis, weight loss did not correlate with any inflammatory parameter or Hurley. Conclusions: Liraglutide 3mg is effective and safe among patients with HS and obesity. Long-term studies are mandatory to assess the effects of liraglutide on skin lesions and inflammatory markers among subjects with HS beyond weight loss.(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: La hidradenitis supurativa (HS) se asocia a la obesidad. La pérdida de peso frecuentemente comporta una mejora en la gravedad de las lesiones. Casos aislados han sugerido que la liraglutida podría mejorar no solo el peso sino también la piel. Nuestro objetivo fue estudiar los efectos de liraglutida 3mg en pacientes con obesidad y HS sobre los parámetros metabólicos y dermatológicos. Métodos: Catorce pacientes iniciaron tratamiento con liraglutida durante 3meses. La gravedad de las lesiones se evaluó mediante la Escala de Hurley y la calidad de vida con el Dermatology Quality Index (DLQI). Resultados: Hubo una reducción significativa en el IMC (39,3±6,2 vs 35,6±5,8; p=0,002), la circunferencia de cintura (121,3±19,2 vs 110,6±18,1cm; p=0,01), la PCR (4,5±2,2 vs 3±2,1mg/l; p=0,04), la homocisteína (16,2±2,9 vs 13,3±3μmol/l; p=0,005) y el cortisol plasmático (15,9±4,8 vs 12,6±4,5μg/dl; p=0,007). El Hurley (2,6±0,5 vs 1,1±0,3; p=0,002) y la DLQI (12,3±2,8 vs 9,7±6,9; p=0,04) mejoraron significativamente. En el análisis de regresión múltiple, la pérdida de peso no se correlacionó con ningún parámetro inflamatorio ni con el Hurley. Conclusiones: Liraglutida 3mg es eficaz y segura en pacientes con HS y obesidad. Serán necesarios estudios a largo plazo para evaluar los efectos de la liraglutida sobre las lesiones cutáneas y los marcadores inflamatorios en la HS más allá de la pérdida de peso.(AU)

Hidradenitis supurativa / Hidradenitis suppurativa

La hidradenitis supurativa (HS) es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica y recurrente derivada de la unidad pilosebácea, que afecta aproximadamente al 1% de la población general. Se caracteriza clínicamente por nódulos inflamatorios, abscesos y túneles en las áreas intertriginosas del cuerpo, especialmente en las regiones axilar, inguinal y anogenital. La etiopatogenia de la HS no está totalmente aclarada, aunque se considera que es multifactorial, y resultado de una compleja interacción entre factores genéticos, hormonales, ambientales e inmunológicos. En este sentido, determinadas citocinas proinflamatorias como el factor de necrosis tumoral-alfa (TNF-α), la interleucina (IL)-1β y la IL-17, entre otras, parecen desempeñar un papel fundamental en la patogénesis de la enfermedad. Actualmente, la HS es considerada una enfermedad inflamatoria sistémica asociada con numerosas comorbilidades, incluyendo enfermedades cardiovasculares, inmunomediadas y trastornos endocrino-metabolicos. El tratamiento de la HS debe realizarse con un enfoque individualizado y orientado al paciente, considerando modalidades de tratamiento médico y quirúrgico.(AU)

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and debilitating inflammatory disease derived from the pilosebaceous unit, that affects approximately 1% of the general population. Clinically, it is characterized by inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and tunnels in the intertriginous areas of the body, especially in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. The etiopathogenesis of HS is not completely understood, although it is considered to be multifactorial, and the result of a complex interaction between genetic, hormonal, environmental, and immunological factors. In this sense, several proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-L-1β, and IL-17, among others, appear to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Currently, HS is recognized as a systemic disease associated with numerous comorbidities, including cardiovascular, immune-mediated, and endocrine-metabolic diseases. The treatment of HS must be carried out with an individualized and patient-oriented approach, considering medical and surgical treatment modalities.(AU)

A New Tool to Improve Communication Between Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients and Health Care Providers.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients tend to experience diagnosis delay, misdiagnosis, and embarrassment due to their condition. To address these issues, the International Dermatology Outcome Measure (IDEOM) HS Workgroup collaborated with patients to modify an existing Novartis questionnaire to better suit the needs of HS patients. This quality improvement project aimed to use the resulting Shine a Light on HS as Modified by the IDEOM HS Workgroup Questionnaire to enhance communication between HS patients and providers, improve clinical experience for HS patients, and gather relevant demographic data. METHOD: Patients with HS presenting to Mount Sinai Union Square over a 9-month long period were invited to complete the Shine a Light on HS as Modified by the IDEOM HS Workgroup Questionnaire before seeing their providers. After the visit, patients rated their overall clinical experience and the helpfulness of the survey on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: The analysis cohort (n=30) consisted of a racially and ethnically diverse patient population. On a scale of 0-4, the mean helpfulness rating was 3.1 (SD=1), and the mean clinical experience rating was 3.5 (SD=0.78). There was a positive correlation between survey helpfulness and overall clinical experience and a moderately strong relationship by linear regression analysis (r=0.73, R2=0.53). 80% reported frequent flares, 54% reported >10 years of symptoms, and the most commonly affected areas were the axillae, gluteal cleft, groin, and inguinocrural folds. The mean pain rating was 8 out of 10 (SD=2.55, Var=6.5). The majority of patients reported scars, tunnels, open wounds, ER/Urgent Care visits, inflammatory skin symptoms, and systemic symptoms. 39% had a positive HS family history. Biologics were the least common previous treatment reported (43%). Emotional burden was reported by nearly all patients, and comorbidities included depression, heart disease, arthritis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), diabetes, and irritable bowel disease (IBD). CONCLUSION: The Shine a Light on HS as Modified by the IDEOM HS Workgroup Questionnaire was successful in improving HS patient-provider conversations, enhancing the overall clinical experience for HS patients, and collecting insightful demographic data. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating the questionnaire as part of their routine care for HS to enhance clinical discussion and improve outcomes for patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):105-109.   doi:10.36849/JDD.7624.

Efficacy and Durability of Intravenous Ertapenem Therapy for Recalcitrant Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Importance: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating follicular skin disorder in which bacterial colonization is typical. Oral antibiotic efficacy can be unreliable; however, selective intravenous antibiotics, specifically ertapenem, may provide favorable clinical outcomes. Objective: To explore optimal course duration, efficacy, and patient satisfaction associated with intravenous ertapenem for HS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective review of the medical records of 98 patients with HS between 2018 and 2022 measured and evaluated patient outcomes before and after treatment with intravenous ertapenem. Participants were followed up in a telephone survey assessing patient perspectives and satisfaction. All of those included in this study received medical care from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine's Montefiore HS Center. Exposures: Patients were treated with 1 g of ertapenem that was self-administered at home through a peripheral intravenous central catheter using an elastomeric pump for 12 to 16 weeks. Antiandrogens and immunomodulatory biologic therapies initiated prior to ertapenem were maintained throughout the treatment course. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes, encompassing clinical severity (evaluated through the HS Physician Global Assessment score [a 6-point scale ranging from clear to very severe] and a numerical rating scale for pain [an 11-point scale in which a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible pain]) and markers of inflammation (such as leukocytes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6), were measured at baseline, the midcourse of intravenous ertapenem treatment, at the end of the course, and posttherapy. Bacterial abundance was also examined at these 4 points, and patient satisfaction was assessed during follow-up. Results: A total of 98 patients (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [13.0] years; 61 [62.2%] female) with HS were treated with intravenous ertapenem. The self-reported racial distribution included 3 individuals identifying as Asian (3.1%), 59 as Black/African American (60.2%), 13 as White (13.3%), and 23 as either other or unknown (23.5%). Additionally, 24 participants (24.5%) reported Spanish/Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. The mean (SD) treatment duration spanned 13.1 (4.0) weeks, with posttherapy follow-up occurring after 7.8 (3.6) weeks. From baseline to posttherapy follow-up, significant reductions were found in the mean (SD) HS Physician Global Assessment scores (3.9 [1.0] vs 2.7 [1.2]; P < .001) and the numerical rating scale for pain (4.2 [3.3] vs 1.8 [2.7]; P < .001), C-reactive protein (5.4 [11.4] vs 2.4 [2.0] mg/dL; P < .001), interleukin-6 (25.2 [21.1] vs 13.7 [13.9]; P < .001), and leukocytes (11.34 [3.9] vs 10.0 [3.4]; P < .001). At follow-up, 76 patients (78.0%) participated in the telephone survey, where 63 (80.3%) reported medium to high satisfaction; further, 69 (90.8%) would recommend ertapenem to other patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective review of medical records and telephone survey, treating HS with intravenous ertapenem, administered for a mean of 13 weeks, was associated with improvement in clinical and inflammatory markers, as well as heightened patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, this approach should be monitored for the emergence of antimicrobial resistance given a longer than standard treatment course.

A Practical Guide to Using Biologics in Pediatric Dermatology.

Psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), atopic dermatitis (AD), and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), are common, immune-mediated, chronic, inflammatory skin diseases that can affect the pediatric population. While there is adequate evidence supporting the use of biologics in pediatric patients, concerns regarding safety and efficacy amongst healthcare providers are not uncommon. However, new emerging evidence in this population highlights the safety of biologic therapy, making it crucial to review and establish a practical guide for their use. This article describes a methodological framework for initiating biologics in the management of pediatric psoriasis, HS, AD, and CSU, with a special focus on baseline work-up, monitoring, dosing, and considerations in this population.

Factors Affecting Treatment Selection Among Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Importance: Despite the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of adalimumab for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), prescription rates remain low, indicating a critical gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice. Understanding the medical decision-making process that these patients use when considering biologic agents and other HS therapies may uncover opportunities for improved patient-physician communication and HS disease control. Objective: To elucidate factors that affect the medical decision-making process for patients with HS, with an emphasis on biologic therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-ended semistructured interviews were conducted with English-speaking adults with HS (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 2 dermatology clinics that are part of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. All participants had an average 7-day pain score of 1 or higher on a 0- to 10-point numeric rating scale. Surveys were conducted between November 2019 and March 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to August 2022. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached at 21 interviews. Results: A total of 21 participants (median [IQR] age, 38.5 [27.9-43.4] years; 16 females [76%]) were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (96%) had Hurley stage II or III disease, and 15 (71%) had a history of adalimumab use. Suffering threshold, perceptions of treatment risk, treatment fatigue, disease understanding, and sources of information (included dermatologists, the internet, advertisements, and friends and loved ones) were identified as factors affecting participants' decisions to initiate new treatments for HS. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this qualitative study suggest that mitigating misconceptions about treatment risk, identifying gaps in disease knowledge, and emphasizing early treatment to prevent scarring and disease progression may empower patients with HS to engage in treatment planning and to try new therapies.

Drivers of disease severity and burden of hidradenitis suppurativa: a cross-sectional analysis on 553 German patients.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the inverse skin regions with an age peak at around 40 years and an estimated prevalence of 1%. Nodules and abscesses can develop into fistules and scarring, which cause severe pain. HS is a progressive, life-defining disease that leads to physical limitations, inability to work, and social isolation. There is still little data on the drivers of disease severity and burden. METHOD: The cross-sectional study is based on the baseline data of 553 participants of the health care research project "EsmAiL," which was carried out as a multicenter randomized controlled trial. It included adult HS-patients presenting with at least three inflammatory lesions and at least a moderate impact on quality of life. RESULTS: Disease activity increases with age. Men are more severely affected than women but feel less burdened. Obesity negatively influences disease activity and disease burden. Affected individuals have a higher level of education than the age adjusted population, but the unemployment rate is significantly higher. Disease activity significantly reduces quality of life and promotes depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: HS is a severe and debilitating dermatosis. As a result of the well-established factors involved, HS requires a multi-causal approach to management, in addition to medical and surgical treatment. This must take into account all available therapeutic options, as well as patient education to reduce risk factors and pain, and psychological support. HS requires interdisciplinary and multi-professional care. To prevent disease progression, a structured treatment plan is needed.